Skip to main content

Primary sourceDocument1832

Worcester v. Georgia

John Marshall · 1832

The 1832 Supreme Court ruling affirming Cherokee sovereignty, which Jackson declined to enforce.

Jackson's reported refusal to enforce this ruling against Cherokee removal is central to debates about his disregard for judicial authority.

Full text (Wikisource)

About this source

What it is

Worcester v. Georgia was a Supreme Court case decided in 1832. Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion held that a Georgia law restricting non-Native Americans on Cherokee land was unconstitutional, recognizing the Cherokee Nation's right to govern its own territory.

Why it matters

The ruling laid foundations for the idea of tribal sovereignty in American law. President Andrew Jackson did not enforce the decision, and it is central to debates about his disregard for the courts and his role in the removal of Native peoples. The case also involved missionary Samuel Worcester, who had defended Cherokee sovereignty and was imprisoned under the Georgia law the Court struck down.

Look closer

  • Why did the Supreme Court say Georgia's law was unconstitutional?
  • What does Jackson's refusal to enforce the ruling suggest about the relationship between the presidency and the courts?
  • Why might this case matter to Cherokee people specifically, beyond the legal arguments?

This document is part of the curated material that grounds the AI version of Andrew Jackson on Humy.ai — when students ask about related events, the AI can quote it and cite it.

Ready when you are

Start chatting with Andrew Jackson now.

20 messages free · No credit card · Available in 50+ languages.