Skip to main content

Essay assignment

Socrate e i sofisti: dialogo, verità e virtù nell’Atene classica

With Socrates

CollegePhilosophyLiteratureCommunity

A ready-made essay prompt for College, shared by a teacher on Humy. Students write the essay in Humy and an AI Socrates replies. Humy grades it against the rubric below, with feedback for each criterion.

Free teacher account · 20 AI messages a month · No credit card

Format
Essay
Grade
College
Grading
Per criterion

Socrate e i sofisti: dialogo, verità e virtù nell’Atene classica

Preview

Instructions

Quando un discorso persuade milioni di persone, la sua forza dimostra anche che è vero? Socrate ti accompagnerà nell’esame di una domanda che attraversa l’Atene classica e il dibattito pubblico di oggi.

Read the full task View rubric

You have 2 submission attempts

Submit
Preview of the student view · Click anything to try it in Humy

The assignment

Quando un discorso persuade milioni di persone, la sua forza dimostra anche che è vero? Socrate ti accompagnerà nell’esame di una domanda che attraversa l’Atene classica e il dibattito pubblico di oggi.

Missione di scrittura. Scrivi un saggio argomentativo sul rapporto fra Socrate e i sofisti: formula una tesi che valuti affinità e divergenze nel loro uso del dialogo, nella ricerca della verità e nell’idea di virtù.

Una traccia dal passato

Nell’Atene del V secolo a.C. i sofisti insegnavano tecniche di argomentazione; Socrate interrogava i suoi interlocutori per mettere alla prova le loro convinzioni. La pagina dell’Eutifrone riprodotta qui testimonia, in un’edizione successiva, la forma dialogica attraverso cui conosciamo la sua ricerca.

L’Eutifrone, edizione Estienne del 1578: il dialogo come indagine critica.

Dalla tesi alla revisione

Organizza introduzione, paragrafi argomentativi e conclusione. Analizza passi pertinenti dei dialoghi platonici, per esempio Apologia e Protagora; distingui le posizioni degli interlocutori, considera un’obiezione e cita con precisione le prove. Chiedi poi al Socrate virtuale di mettere in discussione la tua tesi e rivedi il testo alla luce delle sue domande.

Per cominciare, premi il pulsante “start assignment” e scrivi una prima tesi.

Rubric

Students can open this rubric while they write. Humy grades the essay against it with feedback for each criterion.

Saggio argomentativo universitario · Massimo 100 punti

Si valuta il saggio dello studente, inclusa la sua revisione: non la qualità delle risposte del Socrate virtuale.

1. Tesi e comprensione filosofica · 30 punti

  • 30 — Tesi originale e circoscritta; valuta con precisione affinità e divergenze su dialogo, verità e virtù.
  • 23 — Tesi chiara; tratta i tre temi con distinzioni perlopiù corrette, ma non sempre approfondite.
  • 14 — Tesi generica; confronto parziale o semplificazioni rilevanti delle posizioni.
  • 0 — Tesi o confronto assenti, oppure ricostruzione sostanzialmente errata.

2. Prove testuali e ragionamento · 30 punti

  • 30 — Analizza passi pertinenti dei dialoghi platonici; distingue gli interlocutori, cita con precisione e spiega come le prove sostengono la tesi.
  • 23 — Usa passi pertinenti e citazioni identificabili; analisi solida, con qualche nesso o distinzione da precisare.
  • 14 — Riferimenti vaghi o prevalentemente riassuntivi; attribuzioni o collegamenti alla tesi incerti.
  • 0 — Prove testuali assenti o attribuite in modo gravemente scorretto.

3. Struttura e confronto critico · 25 punti

  • 25 — Introduzione, paragrafi e conclusione costruiscono un’argomentazione coerente; un’obiezione pertinente è esaminata e affrontata.
  • 19 — Struttura chiara e obiezione presente; risposta o passaggi argomentativi non sempre sviluppati.
  • 11 — Organizzazione discontinua; obiezione appena accennata o priva di risposta.
  • 0 — Argomentazione non organizzata e obiezione assente.

4. Revisione e qualità della scrittura · 15 punti

  • 15 — La revisione documenta quali domande del Socrate virtuale hanno messo alla prova la tesi e migliora concretamente argomenti, precisione e prosa.
  • 11 — Revisione riconoscibile e scrittura chiara; le modifiche rispondono solo in parte alle domande ricevute.
  • 7 — Revisione soprattutto formale o poco documentata; espressione talvolta imprecisa.
  • 0 — Revisione non riscontrabile e scrittura tale da impedire la valutazione del ragionamento.

Calcolo del voto: somma i punti ottenuti nei quattro criteri (massimo 100). Un elaborato vuoto riceve 0 punti complessivi.

The historical figure in this assignment

Meet the AI Socrates
Portrait of Socrates

Socrates

Greek philosopher and teacher known for the Socratic method of questioning.

Students talk to an AI version of Socrates, grounded in a curated biography and selected historical sources. As with any AI, students should check important claims.

In your classroom

Ready for your class in three steps.

  1. Open it in Humy

    Create a free teacher account, open this assignment and choose Copy to my assignments to make it yours.

  2. Share the link

    Students open it and type their first and last name. No email, no password.

  3. Humy grades the essay

    Each essay is graded against the rubric, with feedback for each criterion. You see every result.

Open this assignment in Humy

Signed up but don't see it? Open Assignments → Community library.

Trusted by educators worldwide

Conversations
375,000+
Real exchanges between students and historical figures
Messages exchanged
4,142,000+
Across every figure, classroom and language
Historical figures
1,200+
Each informed by a curated biography and selected sources
Languages supported
50+
From English and Spanish to Arabic and Korean

Paying customers

Used by 100+ schools, universities and organisations

Partner school logo
Partner school logo
Chambersburg Area School District logo
Punahou School logo
Partner school logo
South Florida PBS logo
Partner school logo
Archbishop Mitty High School logo
Kingsburg High School logo
Hyper Island logo
Norwalk Public Schools logo
National Louis University logo
Partner school logo
Nebo School District logo
Connections logo
Partner school logo
Moore Public Schools logo
Partner school logo
University of Wisconsin–River Falls logo
Partner school logo
Partner school logo
Partner school logo
Robbinsville Public Schools logo
Partner school logo
Partner school logo
Partner school logo
Partner school logo
Chambersburg Area School District logo
Punahou School logo
Partner school logo
South Florida PBS logo
Partner school logo
Archbishop Mitty High School logo
Kingsburg High School logo
Hyper Island logo
Norwalk Public Schools logo
National Louis University logo
Partner school logo
Nebo School District logo
Connections logo
Partner school logo
Moore Public Schools logo
Partner school logo
University of Wisconsin–River Falls logo
Partner school logo
Partner school logo
Partner school logo
Robbinsville Public Schools logo
Partner school logo
Partner school logo

What educators are saying

“We enjoyed the program last year and used it frequently.”
“My students say it’s a welcome change of pace. I’m not a fan of the “sage on the stage” model, so I try to incorporate research-oriented and self-paced activities. With Humy, students have to take charge of their learning. They’ve become more adept at critical thinking, forming better questions, and improving their reading comprehension. The interview feature has been my go-to tool. I create assignments where students must ask historical figures a set number of questions, then summarize the responses to ensure they’re truly absorbing the material. This approach lets them actively explore the past rather than passively consuming information.”
“Humy has helped me bring historical figures, sometimes long past, to life. When my students interact with these figures in real-time, it eliminates some of the perceived “ancient” characteristics of my curriculum. This has shifted my students’ thinking away from viewing history as abstract or irrelevant. Real-time interactions make historical figures relatable, even allowing students to ask off-topic questions that help put historical lives in a more relevant context for 13-year-olds. The feature I use the most is the interview feature. After teaching a topic, most recently Gandhi and Joan of Arc, I have the students ask pointed, focused questions. We practice good conversation techniques beforehand, teaching them to listen (or read) carefully and formulate thoughtful follow-up questions rather than just interrogating. It helps students practice effective conversation skills.”

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What do students do in "Socrate e i sofisti: dialogo, verità e virtù nell’Atene classica"?
They write the essay in Humy's editor and submit it. The AI Socrates replies, then Humy grades the essay against the rubric with feedback for each criterion.
How is it graded?
Automatically against the rubric on this page. Each criterion gets a score and written feedback that points to the student's own work. You see every result. Students see their scores too.
Who made this assignment?
A teacher on Humy who shared it with every school. Shared assignments are listed only after they pass Humy's automated content review, and Humy can take one down if it's reported.
Can I change it for my class?
Yes. Open it in Humy and choose Copy to my assignments. You get your own copy of the task, rubric, grade and questions to change before you share it.
Do my students need accounts?
No. Students open the link you share and type their first and last name. No email, no password.
Is Humy free to try?
Yes. A free teacher account includes 20 AI messages a month, shared with your students, plus all five assignment formats and auto-grading. No credit card.
Is Humy.ai safe and compliant for schools?
Yes. Humy.ai is used by more than 100 schools, universities and organisations. The platform is FERPA- and GDPR-aligned, supports SSO, and offers an IT-approval pack tailored for school procurement teams.

Ready when you are

Give this assignment to your class.

Free teacher account · 20 AI messages a month · No credit card.