Dr. Michael Calvert
Assistant Superintendent, South Allegheny School District, Pennsylvania
Been using Humy in his district since 2024
“We enjoyed the program last year and used it frequently.”
Debate assignment
Virtù e vita buona prima del processo: un dibattito con Socrate
With Socrates
CollegePhilosophyCommunity
A ready-made debate for College, shared by a teacher on Humy. Students argue a position against an AI Socrates in a live chat. Humy grades the conversation against the rubric below.
Free teacher account · 20 AI messages a month · No credit card
- Format
- Debate
- Grade
- College
- Grading
- Per criterion
Virtù e vita buona prima del processo: un dibattito con Socrate
PreviewInteract responsibly with the AI and verify facts. Note that teachers have access to these conversations.
Hello, I'm Socrates. I'm ready for our debate. Make your opening argument.
The assignment
Se una scelta giusta compromettesse carriera, sicurezza o reputazione, la faresti comunque? Immagina di discuterne con Socrate nell’Atene che precede il suo processo.
Proposizione da dibattere: per vivere bene, la cura della virtù deve prevalere su successo, sicurezza e reputazione.
Il documento e la domanda
Nell’Eutifrone di Platone, ambientato presso il tribunale prima del processo, Socrate interroga il significato della pietà. Quali conseguenze ha questa ricerca per una vita buona? La pagina qui riprodotta appartiene a un’edizione del 1578, non a un manoscritto dell’Atene antica.
Henri Estienne, Eutifrone (1578): testimonianza della trasmissione del dialogo platonico.
Preparazione e confronto
Esamina passi dell’Eutifrone, formula una tesi e due argomenti fondati su citazioni contestualizzate; prepara un’obiezione e una replica. Nel dibattito esponi la tua posizione, rispondi alle controargomentazioni di Socrate e difendila con rispetto, distinguendo le parole di Platone dalle tue interpretazioni. Per iniziare il confronto, premi il pulsante «start assignment».
Rubric
Students see this rubric before they start. Humy scores the conversation against it and writes feedback for each criterion.
Rubrica basata su tesi, prove e ragionamento (CER), adattata al confronto filosofico universitario. Si valutano soltanto gli interventi dello studente, non le risposte dell’IA.
| Criterio | 4 punti · Eccellente | 3 punti · Solido | 2 punti · Parziale | 1 punto · Iniziale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tesi su virtù e vita buona | Tesi precisa; valuta la priorità della virtù rispetto a successo, sicurezza e reputazione. | Tesi chiara; affronta le principali tensioni tra virtù e interessi personali. | Tesi riconoscibile, ma nesso con la vita buona poco sviluppato. | Posizione generica o incoerente. |
| Due argomenti e prove testuali | Due argomenti distinti; citazioni contestualizzate dell’Eutifrone sostengono inferenze rigorose. | Due argomenti sostenuti da citazioni contestualizzate; qualche passaggio resta implicito. | Un argomento convincente, oppure due con citazioni poco spiegate. | Affermazioni poco sostenute; citazioni assenti o decorative. |
| Interpretazione e distinzione delle fonti | Collega la ricerca sulla pietà alla vita buona; distingue testo platonico, interpretazione personale ed edizione del 1578. | Interpreta la ricerca socratica; distingue la propria lettura da Platone e riconosce l’edizione successiva. | Collegamento filosofico parziale o distinzioni tra fonti incerte. | Confonde interpretazione e testo, oppure tratta l’edizione come fonte ateniese. |
| Obiezione, replica e controargomentazioni | Formula un’obiezione incisiva, vi replica e risponde puntualmente alle controargomentazioni di Socrate. | Presenta obiezione e replica; risponde in modo pertinente a Socrate. | Obiezione o replica superficiale; risposta a Socrate solo parziale. | Elude le controargomentazioni o non sviluppa una replica. |
| Chiarezza e rispetto nel dibattito | Interventi ordinati e incisivi; ascolta, adatta la difesa della tesi e mantiene un tono rispettoso. | Interventi chiari e pertinenti; dialoga con rispetto. | Confronto comprensibile ma poco organizzato o talvolta evasivo. | Interventi difficili da seguire o scarso confronto con l’interlocutore. |
Come calcolare il punteggio finale: assegna a ciascuno dei cinque criteri il punteggio del livello raggiunto e somma i punti: il massimo è 20. Assegna 0 punti a un criterio per cui non esiste alcun intervento valutabile dello studente. Se nel confronto mancano sia una tesi difesa sia almeno un argomento, la prova non raggiunge la soglia minima e vale 0/20. Le parole prodotte dall’IA non aggiungono punti.
The historical figure in this assignment
Meet the AI Socrates
Socrates
Greek philosopher and teacher known for the Socratic method of questioning.
Students talk to an AI version of Socrates, grounded in a curated biography and selected historical sources. As with any AI, students should check important claims.
In your classroom
Ready for your class in three steps.
Open it in Humy
Create a free teacher account, open this assignment and choose Copy to my assignments to make it yours.
Share the link
Students open it and type their first and last name. No email, no password.
Humy grades the conversation
Each chat is scored against the rubric, with feedback for each criterion. You see every result.
Open this assignment in Humy
Signed up but don't see it? Open Assignments → Community library.
Collections with Socrates
All collectionsMore assignments
All assignments
Philosophy, Literature
Socrate e i sofisti: dialogo, verità e virtù nell’Atene classica
CommunityEssayCollege
with Socrates
Philosophy, History
The Influence of Greek Philosophy on Modern Thought
Humy teamShort questionsGrade 12
with Socrates
German
Datenschutz im Alltag: Wie viel Privatsphäre sollten wir für Online-Dienste preisgeben?
CommunityDebateAdult education
with Coda the Coding Coach
Trusted by educators worldwide
- Conversations
- 375,000+
- Real exchanges between students and historical figures
- Messages exchanged
- 4,142,000+
- Across every figure, classroom and language
- Historical figures
- 1,200+
- Each informed by a curated biography and selected sources
- Languages supported
- 50+
- From English and Spanish to Arabic and Korean
Paying customers
Used by 100+ schools, universities and organisations
What educators are saying
Jacob Chisom
World and American History, Monticello High School, Arkansas
Been using Humy in his classroom since 2024
“My students say it’s a welcome change of pace. I’m not a fan of the “sage on the stage” model, so I try to incorporate research-oriented and self-paced activities. With Humy, students have to take charge of their learning. They’ve become more adept at critical thinking, forming better questions, and improving their reading comprehension. The interview feature has been my go-to tool. I create assignments where students must ask historical figures a set number of questions, then summarize the responses to ensure they’re truly absorbing the material. This approach lets them actively explore the past rather than passively consuming information.”
Roger Campbell
7th-grade World History, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Been using Humy in his classroom since 2024
“Humy has helped me bring historical figures, sometimes long past, to life. When my students interact with these figures in real-time, it eliminates some of the perceived “ancient” characteristics of my curriculum. This has shifted my students’ thinking away from viewing history as abstract or irrelevant. Real-time interactions make historical figures relatable, even allowing students to ask off-topic questions that help put historical lives in a more relevant context for 13-year-olds. The feature I use the most is the interview feature. After teaching a topic, most recently Gandhi and Joan of Arc, I have the students ask pointed, focused questions. We practice good conversation techniques beforehand, teaching them to listen (or read) carefully and formulate thoughtful follow-up questions rather than just interrogating. It helps students practice effective conversation skills.”
Dr. Michael Calvert
Assistant Superintendent, South Allegheny School District, Pennsylvania
Been using Humy in his district since 2024
“We enjoyed the program last year and used it frequently.”
Jacob Chisom
World and American History, Monticello High School, Arkansas
Been using Humy in his classroom since 2024
“My students say it’s a welcome change of pace. I’m not a fan of the “sage on the stage” model, so I try to incorporate research-oriented and self-paced activities. With Humy, students have to take charge of their learning. They’ve become more adept at critical thinking, forming better questions, and improving their reading comprehension. The interview feature has been my go-to tool. I create assignments where students must ask historical figures a set number of questions, then summarize the responses to ensure they’re truly absorbing the material. This approach lets them actively explore the past rather than passively consuming information.”
Roger Campbell
7th-grade World History, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Been using Humy in his classroom since 2024
“Humy has helped me bring historical figures, sometimes long past, to life. When my students interact with these figures in real-time, it eliminates some of the perceived “ancient” characteristics of my curriculum. This has shifted my students’ thinking away from viewing history as abstract or irrelevant. Real-time interactions make historical figures relatable, even allowing students to ask off-topic questions that help put historical lives in a more relevant context for 13-year-olds. The feature I use the most is the interview feature. After teaching a topic, most recently Gandhi and Joan of Arc, I have the students ask pointed, focused questions. We practice good conversation techniques beforehand, teaching them to listen (or read) carefully and formulate thoughtful follow-up questions rather than just interrogating. It helps students practice effective conversation skills.”
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
What do students do in "Virtù e vita buona prima del processo: un dibattito con Socrate"?
They read the task and the rubric and argue their position in a live chat. When they finish, Humy scores the conversation against the rubric with feedback for each criterion.
How is it graded?
Automatically against the rubric on this page. Each criterion gets a score and written feedback that points to the student's own work. You see every result. Students see their scores too.
Who made this assignment?
A teacher on Humy who shared it with every school. Shared assignments are listed only after they pass Humy's automated content review, and Humy can take one down if it's reported.
Can I change it for my class?
Yes. Open it in Humy and choose Copy to my assignments. You get your own copy of the task, rubric, grade and questions to change before you share it.
Do my students need accounts?
No. Students open the link you share and type their first and last name. No email, no password.
Is Humy free to try?
Yes. A free teacher account includes 20 AI messages a month, shared with your students, plus all five assignment formats and auto-grading. No credit card.
Is Humy.ai safe and compliant for schools?
Yes. Humy.ai is used by more than 100 schools, universities and organisations. The platform is FERPA- and GDPR-aligned, supports SSO, and offers an IT-approval pack tailored for school procurement teams.
Ready when you are
Give this assignment to your class.
Free teacher account · 20 AI messages a month · No credit card.