Skip to main content

Primary sourceBook1748

Of Miracles

David Hume · 1748

A section of Hume's Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding arguing that testimony can never rationally prove a miracle has occurred.

One of Hume's own most controversial and influential arguments, central to his reputation as a sceptic.

Full text (public-domain edition)

About this source

What it is

'Of Miracles' is Section X of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, written by David Hume and published in 1748. In it Hume argues that because miracles are by definition violations of the laws of nature, no amount of human testimony can ever make it reasonable to believe one has occurred.

Why it matters

This short section became one of the most debated passages in the history of philosophy of religion. It challenged the evidence many people relied on to support religious belief, and sparked responses from theologians and philosophers for centuries afterward. It shows Hume applying his general scepticism about causation and evidence to a specific, highly sensitive topic of his time.

Look closer

  • What does Hume mean by weighing the probability of a miracle against the probability that a witness is mistaken or lying?
  • Why might this argument have been controversial in Hume's lifetime?
  • Can you think of modern examples where people argue about weighing evidence against unlikely claims?

This book is part of the curated material that grounds the AI version of David Hume on Humy.ai — when students ask about related events, the AI can quote it and cite it.

Ready when you are

Start chatting with David Hume now.

20 messages free · No credit card · Available in 50+ languages.